|
Post by Waddling Mummies GM on May 12, 2010 14:41:22 GMT -5
1.3 Dez Bryant, WR, Cowboys 2.3 Jermaine Gresham, TE, Bengals 3.3 Caralton Mitchell, WR, Browns 4.3 Nate Allen, S, Eagles 4.11 James Starks, RB, Packers 5.3 Colt McCoy, Qb, Browns 6.2 Patrick Angerer, LB, Colts 6.3 Deji Karim, RB, Jaguars
|
|
|
Post by jettsdad01 on May 14, 2010 0:45:32 GMT -5
I also had pick 6.2 mlb Patrick Angerer Colts
|
|
|
Post by Waddling Mummies GM on May 14, 2010 2:35:50 GMT -5
thank you its ajusted. took me a while to get everyones picks, did it by hand, so i figured i missed a few.
Dez and Gresham should be starters fro your team and theirs in the next 2 years at worst. I think the Angener was a good pick too. he will be brackets replacement
|
|
|
Post by AVERAGE HERO'S GM on May 15, 2010 8:53:54 GMT -5
I voted B.
I like Gresham a lot, but I think I might be the only person who wouldn't have touched him until the third round, so I could put him on my PS to see what happens. I'm just not convinced that the Bengals will change the offensive scheme to target the TE. Especially after bringing in so much WR help. However, I do understand whhy you took him there. Carlton Mitchell I think would have lasted longer, since he's only a 1 year starter and is a very raw project. He's got a lot of work ahead of him in route running and getting his hands consistant. So you kinda lost me on those two picks. However, you got nice value on McCoy and I liked the Angerer pickup.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Claymores GM on May 19, 2010 15:36:41 GMT -5
I like the draft, but think Gresham was a reach - I feel that it's the system in Cincy that prevents productive TEs not (just) the talent level. Good value for McCoy, but I was surprised that Mitchell was taken before Decker.
|
|