|
Post by Washington Imperials GM on Jan 3, 2011 21:47:26 GMT -5
simple majority to pass
effective 2011
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Claymores GM on Jan 4, 2011 11:40:59 GMT -5
Big yes to this one, losing lots of players out is really just about luck
|
|
|
Post by Washington Imperials GM on Jan 4, 2011 12:28:39 GMT -5
Poll Question did not go up entirely it should finish a player needs to be put on the NFL IR to qualify to be put on the DFFL IR
|
|
|
Post by AVERAGE HERO'S GM on Jan 4, 2011 16:10:16 GMT -5
I suppose this makes sense if they aren't counting against the cap. The current salary cap rules limit IR more then this rule to me.
|
|
|
Post by AVERAGE HERO'S GM on Jan 4, 2011 16:18:25 GMT -5
If we are going to make IR slots unlimited and not count against the cap, I'd like to see a rule that does not allow a team to pick up a player from DFFL free agency who has already been put on the NFL IR and basically carry that player for free on the DFFL IR.
|
|
|
Post by Tulsa Roughnecks GM on Jan 5, 2011 8:31:03 GMT -5
If we are going to make IR slots unlimited and not count against the cap, I'd like to see a rule that does not allow a team to pick up a player from DFFL free agency who has already been put on the NFL IR and basically carry that player for free on the DFFL IR. Excellent point. I agree.
|
|
|
Post by vsamuels1218 on Jan 6, 2011 13:37:29 GMT -5
that makes sense
|
|
|
Post by Washington Imperials GM on Jan 6, 2011 22:26:50 GMT -5
an actual majority is obtained this rule will pass unless someone changes thier mind, this poll will be locked monday if no one changes thier votes.
|
|
|
Post by Washington Imperials GM on Jan 10, 2011 21:36:46 GMT -5
OK this poll is now closed and the motion passes.
|
|